The Photo Sharing Thread with Tips and Hints (Part 2)

straydingo

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2011
1,139
645
113
Melbourne
As a follow on from Andrea's thread for tips and hints (Thanks Andrea) lets also start one or more for specific "how do I....." questions. Hopefully this could compliment the first thread nicely
I'm sure we have all seen photos around and wondered "How do I get mine to do that". So ask your questions. There isn't always one exact answer, so you'll be likely to get a few different ones to try out

How do I shoot the full moon? An insect? In the rain? into the sun?
How do i get rich colours in the sky? In the sands? In the grass?
Why are some backgrounds blurred and others not?
Why would we want to use a prime (non-zoom) lens instead of a zoom?
Why is a Pentax better than Canon or Nikon? :D:D
What is post processing and how do I do it

etc etc etc
 

chartrock

Forum Patriarch
Staff member
Sep 26, 2010
6,133
7,403
113
Gold Coast Hinterland
Great stuff straydingo. You've posed some good questions there, things I would like to know. Can you supply the answers or is the plan to get others on the forum to provide their own solutions or methods to these queries?

Whichever way, I will be keen to see some answers and try some experiments with my Nikon D3100. (I did notice Nikon was last on your list of 3 :))
 

straydingo

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2011
1,139
645
113
Melbourne
Just trying to prompt some questions for what people *want* to know with some examples.


Certainly, if you'd like to know why Pentax is so much better better.....:D
Just tongue in cheek - It the old holden/ford, lc200/patrol/discover arguments all over again
In cropped DSLR cameras (entry/medium level) they're all equal performers, along with Sony and Olympus. They all have different features, but all do the same quality job. In the professional or upper end Full Frame systems, then its really Canon or Nikon as the others don't produce them yet. But the marketing budgets are much bigger for Canon and Nikon, so we see them more often used. Sony was a late comer in the DSLR market so have catch up to do but now in their later generations are certainly producing some fantastic products
Personally, I shoot with a couple of Pentax cameras and mix of Pentax, Sigma and Tamron lenses.
 

Brad

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2012
2,645
722
113
Rowville, Victoria
The one about shooting the moon is a good one. Ever seen the pics of a massive moon over a city skyline at night?
Well it is an impossible shot cause the moon is too bright.
The only way to do it is to take a shot of the city skyline with the correct aperture settings.
Then take a second shot of the moon at the correct settings 1/60 sec for whatever aperture it takes.
The two pics are then photoshopped together to make the final pic.
 

straydingo

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2011
1,139
645
113
Melbourne
Well, I'm kicking myself cos my computer crashed last week and lost my calender input so missed it....
But we should start seeing a number of "big moon over city" photos popping up in the next couple of days. Last night was this years 'super moon' where it is at the closest to earth so does appear very large....
 

Johnstons

Active Member
Aug 10, 2012
147
25
28
Anywhere in the great outdoors
Hi straydingo, I'm thinking of buying a Canon SLR and have been looking at either a 450,500 or 550.
It does have a lot to do with price but I am wondering what your opinion is of these?
Its for entry level.
Cheers
 

straydingo

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2011
1,139
645
113
Melbourne
Hi straydingo, I'm thinking of buying a Canon SLR and have been looking at either a 450,500 or 550.
It does have a lot to do with price but I am wondering what your opinion is of these?
Its for entry level.
Cheers

I'm not particularly knowledgeable in Canons as I have used Pentaxs for the past 20 years. While I have briefly used Canons, it has never been in depth - others will advise better.
Canon is and always has been a great product so generally should have no issues.

Firstly, (and I'll be blunt sorry)
WHY do you think a DSLR suits your needs?
Are you new to SLR/DSLR camera or comfortable using them?
How are you wanting to display your photography - on screen display, poster prints, photo album/books, advertising?
What do you like to shoot? Animals, portraits, landscapes, objects etc, or a mix of everything.
Do you intend to swap lenses or single a single one only?
What is your real budget for camera and lenses?

So subject to the questions above;
Looking at those three models I'm presuming you aren't buying new? 450 was released in 2008, 500 in 2009 and the 550 in 2010, but were all marketed for about two years.
As the models got newer, the features included improved also, or at least got more features.

The megapixels are 12, 15 and 18 for the three models respectively. Megapixels is often misunderstood and is a great marketing tool from the manufacturers - that more is best. Thats not always the case. While more can give a sharper image, depending on what you do with those images, it can have no effect at all. For a 4x6 print, a 6MP will generally have the same appearance as a 20MP. If blowing up to poster size, then the larger MP will be better. If blowing up to billboard size, even 12MP is still ok, because we stand so far back from it, that the pixels still run together and we see a 'sharp' image.
Plus we still need to store the photos we take - the file size of a 12MP image compared to an 18MP is very different.
(I use both a 12MP and a 16MP only)

Other differences between the cameras:
More ISO settings as the models went up
Live view was added to 500+550 (ability to see the image on the screen rather than through the eyepiece viewer)
The screen resolution increased dramatically allowing clearer images for review or in live view.
Manual settings and preset scenes added to 500+550 (I believe??)
Video record plus microphone added to 500+550
MMC format cards dropped after 450
HDMI added to 500+550

Generally everything else remained the same between the three models.
Based on spec level alone and no other considerations, I'd probably take the 500 over the others.

All three were originally considered 'upper entry level' models and cost around the $800-900 mark. Even now, a used 550 can be upto $800 on ebay.
As CD noted above, he picked up a Canon 1100D with single lens for less than $400. Best I could quickly find was around $450 with a 18-55mm IS lenses or $600 twin lens kit. (cruza driver - where did you get yours?)

Throw the 1100D in the mix for even the prices that I found, and I'd take that without hesitation over the other three. Newer technology, warranty and an IS lens. All other 'features' are on par with the 450, and some as per the 550.

As I said, thats on specs alone.....

The lenses though really makes a good image more than the camera body.....
I've spent 5 times as much on lenses than on the bodies.

As for the questions at the top, I still find my little all-in-one snappy can give pics just as good as a DSLR in many situations. To maximise the DSLR you need to spend time to learn it and understand it and all the theory behind the settings, when to change a lens or not, and what sort. If you don't - it is just an expensive snappy, and we can be disappointed with the results when we are expecting something fantastic. I still often am, especially with my recent acquisition - even though the settings are the described the same, they still produce different images to my other one. I'm yet to really understand it's differences etc.
If you get a DSLR, go down to the beach and up in the bush there, and take lots of photos in different light. Set yourself tasks to shoot. "today is a B day. I will shoot stuff starting with B only" "Today is a Green day" "today is a bird day" etc. Being focused on specific attributes rather than taking pics of anything and everything helps focus on what to look for in those attributes. Review the photos and go out and do it again.....
Read the manual - I know, I know. Males don't :)
Learn what happens when you are in AV mode, TV mode, or M mode and those dials are turned. Understand the ISO setting, +/- setting. The best thing about digital cameras, take 1000 photos before you really 'use' it.
And get on one of the Canon and/or general photography forums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnstons

cruza driver

Hercules
Staff member
Nov 9, 2010
6,550
4,447
113
Mighty Victoria
Great post straydingo :clap2: plenty to think about there mate.

I bought mine from Harvey Norman. I went into there specials sections on their web site and found it there. It states delivery only but I did a store search to see which closest store had one in store, gave them a call and picked up and payed for it in store.
 

Johnstons

Active Member
Aug 10, 2012
147
25
28
Anywhere in the great outdoors
:hail: Thankyou so much straydingo for the great response.
Answered all my questions and more.
I just want to be ale to have some great shots left after our trip is all said and done and to use for family shots etc.
We take photos of everything and anything. Close ups, distance etc, but you have got me thinking now.
I'm sure others will get a heaps out of this post too so thanks for taking the time to write it all done.
Cheers
 

straydingo

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2011
1,139
645
113
Melbourne
While the deal is good, the lens aren't the IS lenses. IS is Image Stabilised - small vibrations and movements are cancelled out so you reduce chances of a blur. (especially in low light when the shutter is open longer)
If doing that deal, ask HN if the "Canon EF-S 18-55mm III" can be changes to the "Canon EF-S IS II" lens instead.
Looking at Digital Camera Warehouse they have a $14 difference between the lenses. Maybe HN can do a similar price difference......Its at least worth asking.